All services Fund and Asset Managers Private and Institutional Asset Owners Debt, Capital Markets and Corporate
Close
Close
Close

SFC’s consultation on financial risk rules: Key Implications for internal models and risk governance 

07 Aug 2025

By Philippa Allen, Managing Director, Regulatory Compliance, Asia 

On 14 July 2025, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) released a consultation paper proposing significant updates to the Financial Resources Rules (FRR), along with new guidelines on the internal models approach (IMA) and model risk management (MRM). The proposed reforms aim to align Hong Kong’s capital and risk framework with international standards, particularly Basel III, while enhancing governance expectations and market access for licensed corporations (LCs), especially those involved in over-the-counter derivatives (OTCD). 

To help you navigate the proposed changes, we’ve outlined the key highlights and their practical implications below.   

1. Fine-tuning and updates to the framework

The SFC is proposing a tiered capital structure for OTCD firms based on business model and risk profile. The following refinements aim to reduce unnecessary capital drag while addressing previous industry feedback: 

  • Expanded definition of asset management group central OTCD dealers to include entities regulated in recognised jurisdictions 
  • Reduced capital requirements and computational burden for OTCD inter-dealer brokers 
  • Tiered capital thresholds based on business model and risk exposure 
    • Asset management group central OTCD dealers (e.g. HK$30M paid-up capital, HK$15M required liquid capital (RLC)) 
    • OTCD inter-dealer brokers (e.g. HK$60M paid-up capital, HK$30M RLC) 
    • LCs using internal models or Basel standards must meet higher capital thresholds (e.g. HK$2B tangible capital, HK$156M RLC) 

2a. Standardised market risk approach (SMRA)

To align with international standards, the SFC is refining how market risk is calculated under the standardised approach. These adjustments are intended to improve risk sensitivity while reducing capital impact in specific scenarios. 

  • Scaling factor introduced: Applied in market risk capital calculations to align with the simplified standardised approach under the Banking (Capital) Rules 
  • Gold netting treatment extended: Netting of opposite positions in gold of different fineness is extended to include gold suitable for delivery under contracts traded on the Hong Kong Gold Exchange 
  • Index arbitrage relief: A reduced market risk capital requirement is proposed for index arbitrage portfolios referencing the CSI 300 Index, supporting cross-boundary trading with Mainland markets 

2b. Standardised OTCD counterparty credit risk approach (SOCCRA)

The proposed changes to SOCCRA introduce more granular exposure and collateral rules. These updates aim to better reflect actual counter-party risk and include the following key elements: 

  • Multiplier of 1.4 applied: An alpha of 1.4 is introduced in exposure calculations, consistent with the modified current exposure method 
  • Netting enhancements 
    • Negative market value of OTCD transactions can be included in net exposure if subject to daily revaluation 
    • Netting is allowed between posted and received collateral if they are the same asset or denominated in the same currency 
  • Updated risk weighting 
    • Unrated exposures to LCs or Basel-compliant banks and securities firms are assigned higher risk weights 
    • Exposures to authorised insurers or designated insurance holding companies receive similar treatment 
  • CVA substitute approach 
    • Credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk capital equals counterparty credit risk capital for most LCs unless exposures exceed HK$1 trillion 

3. Internal models approach (IMA) guidelines

For firms seeking to use internal models for capital calculations, the SFC is introducing stricter eligibility and oversight requirements. The following criteria must be met to obtain and maintain approval. 

Eligibility and approval 

  • LCs must apply for SFC approval to use internal models for market risk capital calculations 
  • Models must meet qualitative and quantitative standards aligned with Basel 2.5 and Basel III 

Key requirements 

  • Independent model validation and back-testing 
  • Governance and documentation standards 
  • Coverage of risks not in model (RNIM) 
  • Maintenance of excess liquid capital for illiquidity and RNIM 

4. General principles for model risk management (MRM)

The proposed MRM guidelines are designed to strengthen governance across the model lifecycle. Firms that rely on internal or advanced models should expect to implement the following controls. 

Scope 

  • Applies to LCs using internal models or Basel standards 
  • Also relevant for LCs engaged in OTCD dealing or clearing 

Core principles 

  • Model inventory and classification 
  • Independent validation and periodic revalidation 
  • Governance, documentation and control frameworks 
  • Annual attestation of compliance 

5. New proposals to support market development

To promote innovation and cross-border access, the SFC is expanding the scope of recognised products and markets. These changes also include updates to capital treatment and governance requirements. 

Haircut reductions 

  • FTSE China A50 and MSCI China A50 Connect: from 30% to 15% 
  • CSI 300 Index: from 30% to 20% 

New specified exchanges 

  • The Saudi Exchange, Hochiminh Stock Exchange, Indonesia Stock Exchange 

New tradable commodities 

  • Energy, carbon and freight rate products 

Virtual assets (VA) 

  • Extend FRR treatment to VA-based futures and options traded on licensed VA exchanges 

Repos 

  • Exempt centrally cleared repos from counter-party credit risk charges 

Governance enhancements 

  • The SFC may override LC elections under the FRR 
  • Switching between basic and standardised approaches now requires SFC approval 

Key considerations for regulated entities

Navigating regulatory change can be complex, especially when impacts vary across different business models and licensing set-ups. These proposals may affect capital planning, governance processes and operational readiness for fund managers, broker-dealers, virtual asset service providers, and risk and compliance teams across regulated entities.  

Below are key areas to consider as you assess how the changes could apply to your organisation. 

Capital requirements

  • LCs will need to reassess their capital adequacy under the new tiered framework 
  • Those qualifying as inter-dealer brokers or asset management group central OTCD dealers may benefit from reduced capital thresholds 
  • LCs using internal models or advanced Basel standards must meet higher capital and liquidity requirements 

Compliance and operational readiness

  • LCs must prepare for: 
    • Enhanced documentation and governance obligations 
    • Independent model validation and stress testing 
    • Annual compliance attestations 
    • Smaller firms may face resource constraints in meeting these new standards 

Market access and product expansion

  • Broader recognition of exchanges and products may facilitate: 
    • Greater access to emerging markets 
    • Expansion into VA derivatives and commodity trading 
    • Benefit from more favourable capital treatment for centrally cleared repos and VA-based instruments 

Strategic considerations

  • Firms may need to: 
    • Re-evaluate their business models to optimise capital efficiency 
    • Consider transitioning to basic approaches if internal model compliance is too burdensome 
    • Engage with the SFC early for model approval or clarification on classification 

Looking ahead

The SFC’s proposed reforms represent a significant evolution in Hong Kong’s regulatory landscape. By aligning with global standards and introducing a more risk-sensitive framework, the changes aim to strengthen financial stability and enhance market competitiveness. At the same time, they introduce new compliance, capital and operational challenges for LCs and their stakeholders. Firms are encouraged to review the proposals in detail and submit feedback by the consultation deadline. 

How we can help

At IQ-EQ, we help licensed corporations navigate the practical complexities of evolving capital and risk frameworks. Whether you’re interpreting technical requirements, strengthening governance structures, or preparing for regulatory engagement, our team is here to guide you. 

Our regulatory specialists can assist with:  

  • Assessing the impact of the proposed FRR amendments 
  • Preparing for compliance with the IMA and MRM frameworks 
  • Optimising capital strategies with practical, tailored solutions 
  • Reviewing internal classifications and model governance readiness ahead of SFC engagement

The consultation remains open until 13 October 2025 and now is a good time to explore your options. Please reach out to your IQ-EQ representative or contact us here for tailored guidance and implementation support.

More recent insights from Philippa:

Working with IQ-EQ has been seamless – you and your team understand our business, advise us appropriately, and handle your side of our collective partnership so that we can focus on making good investment decisions. Evan Gibson SVP, Merchants Capital

Get in touch with us today

We’re ready to listen.

Make an enquiry

Interested in joining our team?

We are always on the lookout for passionate people that possess IQ and EQ to join our growing team.

View job vacancies